Showing posts with label Psychology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Psychology. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 February 2014

Affirmative Action

The topic is:  Affirmative Action (may focus on affirmative action for racial or minorities, gender, or sexual orientation)
3. Locate and read at least three (3) peer reviewed articles on the issue in the Strayer University Library or elsewhere.
Here is the website to the texbook - Franzoi, S. L. (2009). PSY 110: Social psychology: 2009 custom edition (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
o At least one (1) article should discuss the historical event(s) or legal decision(s) that make the issue a major one in the United States.
o Two (2) of the articles should have different views about causes, effects, and ways to address the issue.
Write a five to seven (5-7) page paper (1,000 to 1,200 words) in which you:



1. Provide an introduction to the paper with a thesis statement.
2. Describe at least three (3) key historical events and / or legal decisions that make the issue a major or important one in the U.S.
3. Discuss at least three (3) social psychology concepts addressed in the course that are related to the issue.
4. Analyze at least three (3) challenges individuals and law enforcement agencies face with the issue.
5. Explain your agreement with at least three (3) statements by authors of the references cited.
6. Explain your disagreement with at least two (2) statements by authors of the references cited.
7. Recommend at least two (2) ways that individuals should address the issue to help improve social elements involved in the issue.
8. Suggest at least two (2) ways those in criminal justice (police officers, prosecuting attorneys, and / or judges) should address the issue.
9. Provide a conclusion to the paper that includes a reference to the thesis statement and contains a summary of the main points.
10. Provide at least three (3) external peer-reviewed references to support your paper.


Friday, 31 January 2014

NURSING ADMINISTRATION USING FOCUS AND PDCA CYCLES

NURSING ADMINISTRATION USING FOCUS AND PDCA CYCLES IN A SCENARIO PROVIDED

Introduction: Psychiatric emergencies in medical settings may be particularly challenging since the staff does not encounter them frequently and may not have experience dealing with behavioral crisis intervention.
The purpose of this exercise is to help staff improve understanding and coping with nonmedical emergencies that occur in medical settings using the PDCA cycle.
 Mr. X is a 41-year-old male admitted to a medical unit with a diagnosis of possible stroke.
The patient is ambulatory, 5’10’’, and 350 lbs. Mr. X presented to the emergency department the day before after apparently losing consciousness at home. The initial CAT scan of his head was negative. It is suspected that Mr. X may be an IV drug user since his urine toxicology screening came back positive for opiates. The medical staff thinks that Mr. X had a seizure prior to admission, but he has shown no abnormal signs or symptoms within the last 24 hours. Mr. X was moved to an acute care unit where he sits in bed wearing only a pair of ill-fitting boxer shorts and no shirt. He is able to communicate without any signs of aphasia. The medical staff is still not sure what is wrong with Mr. X. As the nurse administrator of the day, you hear a Rapid Response called overhead for this patient. As you enter the room, you see Mr. X screaming and on all fours in his bed. He is saying “Help, help” and “I don’t know” repeatedly. Respiratory staff, physicians, physician’s assistants, an ICU nurse, and unit staff are all standing there watching Mr. X scream for help.
They all seem paralyzed. Finally, one of the staff nurses asks Mr. X to turn over so that respiratory staff can administer oxygen via a facial mask.
He complies and at that time the ICU nurse hooks him up to the cardiac monitor as per protocol in a Rapid Response.


Mr. X remains quiet and still for about 60 seconds and then proceeds to rip off the oxygen mask and the EKG leads attached to his chest.
He climbs over the side rails and stands there in a daze, saying “I don’t know, I don’t know.”
The staff reacts negatively to Mr. X’s behavior in front of him. The respiratory therapist says, “If you think I’m going in to get an ABG from him, you’re crazy.” Speaking to Mr. X, the ICU nurse repeats over and over in a stern impatient voice, “What don’t you know?” Mr. X seems overwhelmed and can’t answer. The physician looks through the chart and asks the nurses questions about the patient. The other nurses stand there staring at Mr. X. The ICU nurse leaves a few minutes later stating that the patient’s EKG is normal. All at once, Mr. X bolts from the room towards the elevator, which has just opened, and gets on. One of the nurses calls a security code, but it is too late; Mr. X has disappeared. The county police are called and hours later they find Mr. X at his nearby home. They try to encourage him to return to the hospital, but since he has not been deemed a danger to himself or others, they have no choice but to leave him alone. The next morning Mr. X returns to the Emergency Department with “severe chest discomfort and a headache” and is admitted back to the same unit. When the staff see him, they are apprehensive and somewhat angry that he is back. After about three hours on the unit, Mr. X starts yelling that his stomach is hurting. His nurse calls the physician about his symptoms but she and the rest of the staff avoid extended contact with him because of what happened the day before. Task: Write an essay (suggested length of 5–10 pages) in which you develop a plan to help this staff become proficient in handling behavioral emergencies on a non-psychiatric unit by doing the following: A. Analyze the situation using the FOCUS and PDCA models by doing the following: 1. Use the FOCUS model to identify possible causes of the staff’s problem.
a. Find a Process to Improve (What needs to be improved based on the incident in the scenario?)
b. Organize a Team That Knows the Process (Who is the leader, the facilitator, the recorder, the time keeper, team member? Do you need all these people? Do you need others?)
c. Clarify Current Knowledge of the Process (What is being done now that might have added to or allowed the incident?)


d. Understand Causes of Process Variation (Use cause-effect diagrams, concept maps or other diagrams to show how you would understand the cause)
e. Select the Process Improvement (What would you do to improve the situation so that you decrease the risk of it occurring again?)
2. Develop an improvement plan that will ensure appropriate response times and appropriate clinical interventions in this situation, using a modified version of the PDCA model (PDC).
a. Plan (develop a plan to address the situation and possible risk in the future)
b. Do (You are not expected to actually do the plan but tell how it would be done)
c. Check (How would you check if the plan worked?)
d. Act (Note: Act has been omitted in the modified version since you are not expected to carry out this plan so you cannot periodically review the change to ensure that it is successful.
B. Write a unit protocol containing at least five directives for staff to follow in case of a behavioral emergency in a non-psychiatric setting.

C. When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format. Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the attached Rubric Terms. Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in a paper or project, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the paper or project. Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the General Instructions section. The school does use turnitin to check for plagarism across the US in term papers so must be original and cited appropriately.

Sunday, 19 January 2014

Lethal Force

Identify an aspect of warfare that has remained relatively constant since the 1600s.  Explain why it has survived four centuries of change.

I need an argumentative essay that can argue "what aspect of warfare that has remained relatively constant since the 1600s. Also, explaining why it has survived four centuries of change.

H100 lesson, says “According to Military Theory, the lethal nature of war itself remains the same (defeat the enemy – death and destruction). What frequently changes are means used to engage in warfare or how we fight.”  The reasons lethal nature has remained unchanged is probably due to the psychology of human nature.  If a child takes a toy from another it creates a fight same as it did a thousand years ago.  And the lethality of war has remained unchanged due to the dehumanizing of the opposing side, if we make them out to be less than human, it is easier to kill and inflict cruelty on them. I would also add that the “human side” –feelings, emotions, response to threats, has also remained the same.


**The essays should include a thesis, major points, and documentation (endnotes or footnotes; NO parenthetical citations).  Below is a list of names that should be used as reference for this essay.  I need a minimum of 4 references.  I can provide articles of this individuals or you can use any articles or quotations from any of the articles or books written by the following list of names: 

•    Carl von Clausewitz
•    Antoine de Jomini
•    Frederick the Great
•    Napoleon
•    Sun Tzu
•    Machiavelli


ALTERNATE Question:

Which theorist best characterizes the nature of warfare, Jomini or Clausewitz? Use evidence from one of these theorists and from H100 to substantiate your argument.


Saturday, 18 January 2014

Rephrase and summarize book

Rephrase and summary of each chapter. 150-160 words per chapter. the word count of each chapter should not include the chapter title please 

CLICK HERE to get this paper

12 Angry men

Watch the (12 Angry Men) movie, and answer the questions that I attached. 

12 Angry Men  (use the original movie, filmed in 1957, starring Henry Fonda)
 Watch the movie.  It is available on youtube or the DVD is available on reserve in the library.
  Answer the following questions as they relate to the movie.  Type the questions and answers and turn them in on the date assigned.  
        •       Give an example of bottom up processing that was inaccurate and explain.
        •       Give an example of top down processing that was inaccurate and explain why it was inaccurate.
        •       Give an example of two defense mechanisms—name them and explain.
        •       Give an example of a heuristic problem solving technique.
        •       Give an example of an algorithm problem solving technique.
        •       Give an example of social informative influence.
        •       Give an example of normative social influence.

        •       Choose two other psychological concepts from your text.  Find examples in the movie that exemplify them