Final Argumentative Paper

Final Argumentative Paper

Three important sub-disciplines of philosophy are addressed in this course: ethics, epistemology, and religion. For this paper, you will develop an argument that includes your own view on one specific topic relating to one of these sub-disciplines. Below is a list of topics from which you must choose. Feel free to combine topics that seem to fit with one another. It is recommended that you choose a topic that interests you or that you have thought about previously.

In philosophical papers, it is always best to present both sides of the issue (remember that there are usually more than two sides to any issue), and then to present the side that you find the most convincing. Remember to back up your position with logical reasoning and factual evidence. In addition, be sure to utilize the philosophical content and ideas that you have encountered in this course.

CLICK HERE to get this paper!!

Identify the issue that you are going to examine.
Within that issue, clearly define the specific problem that will be the focus of the paper.
Present multiple sides of the [problem and state your position on the issue.
Create an argument that supports the side of the problem you take in the paper. As part of your argument, be sure to critique the weaknesses of opposing positions.
Utilize the philosophical theories and ideas that you have encountered in this course as much as possible. It is best to utilize primary philosophical texts as resources. Include at least five academic sources in this paper, at least three of which must come from the Ashford University Library. Any other resources should come from academic sources such as Project Gutenberg, classicallibrary.org, or other websites that include peer-reviewed articles and books.
Select a topic from the following sub-disciplines:

Ethics
What is the best ethical system?
Is it necessary to have universal ethical principles?
What are the fundamental principles of ethics?
What is the good life and how does one achieve it?
Is ethics natural or learned behavior?
What is an ethically bad life? How do we know?
How do humans differentiate between good and bad in the realm of ethics?
Do ethical actions have value apart from the outcomes of those actions?
Are humans free or determined, and how does this perspective relate to human responsibility?

CLICK HERE to get this paper!!

Epistemology
What can humans know for certain and how can they justify that they actually know what they think they know?
What are the limits of human perception and cognition?
What is the relationship between scientific knowledge and other types of knowledge?
What are the limits of skepticism?
What are the differences between the mind and the brain?
What is the best epistemological argument and explanation of how humans perceive their worlds?
How did human consciousness emerge and where is it headed?

CLICK HERE to get this paper!!

Religion
Is proof for the existence of God necessary?
Which argument for the existence of God is strongest? Why?
Can one be moral and not believe in God?
Are science and religion in conflict?
Can God’s omniscience and human free will be reconciled?
Is there a rational argument for atheism?
The paper must be at least six pages in length, formatted according to APA style, and include a title and a reference page (which does not count towards the page length). Support your point with examples from the text and at least five sources, three of which must be found in the Ashford University Library. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar.

CLICK HERE to get this paper!!

Commercialization of Organ Transplants

Assignment 1: Commercialization of Organ Transplants

Due Week 4 and worth 200 points

Imagine that you are a member of an ethics committee listening to arguments for and against altering the way in which human organs are obtained for patients in need of transplants. A new policy to allow the sale of organs by consenting individuals to patients in need and to medical institutions has been proposed. Critics argue that permitting organs to be bought and sold is unethical. You have been asked to review the arguments for and against the commercialization of organ transplants and to construct a report with your suggested plan of action. Use the Internet or Strayer databases to search for arguments for and against the commercialization of organ transplants, and then apply the principles learned in Weeks 1-3 to formulate your report.

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: 

1.Briefly summarize the arguments for and against the commercialization of transplants that you found in your research. 
2.Formulate your position on the debate of whether or not the sale of organs should be permitted. 
3.Defend your moral judgment with a moral argument. Identify the moral principle that you are appealing to in your moral argument. 
4.Determine which normative theory best supports your conclusion.
5.Use at least two (2) quality references. (Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.)
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

•Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
•Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

•Determine the considerations for and process of ethical business decision making to balance corporate and social responsibilities and address moral, economic, and legal concerns.
•Analyze selected business situations using the predominant ethical theories, such as utilitarian, Kantian, and virtue ethics to guide ethical business decision making.
•Use technology and information resources to research issues in business ethics.
•Write clearly and concisely about business ethics using proper writing mechanics. 

CLICK TO ORDER this paper from a professional writer!!!

MILL AND UTILITARIANISM

USE BOOK. JOHN STUART MILL, UTILITARIANISM 2ND EDITION BY GEORGE SHER 

( CHAPTERS 1 AND 2) ONLY AND IMMANUAEL KANT, GROUNDWORK FOR THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS HARPER PUBLISHER BY H.J. PATON

From his comments on "intuitive" ethics. It is clear that Mill believes that Kant in his major rival as a moral philosopher. In Utilitarianism he often positions himself as defending his "principle of utility" or Greatest Happiness Principle against criticisms from Kantians. Explain the central tenants of utilitarianism (including the principle of utility and utilitarian calculus) and then contrast them with the tenants and methods of the "intuitive school." How does Mill defend utilitarianism (consequential more broadly) against Kant's deontology? What does he believe is deficient in Kant's ethics? Finally, which, according to you, is better ethical system and why? Make sure to give reasons and arguments for your answer.

PLEASE MAKE IT SIMPLE AND EASY TO READ. YOU CAN BREAK ALL THE QUESTIONS INTO DIFFERENT PARAGRAPHS

WHEN IS COMES TO CHOOSING BETTER ETHICAL SYSTEM CHOOSE UTILITARIANISM AND EXPLAIN WHY?

CLICK HERE to get this paper done

Justice_ Nelson Mandela - Rivonia Trial

consider a real world example where the concept of justice plays an important role. use the Nelson Mandela case in the "Ethical Dilemmas and decisions in criminal justice" by Joycelyn m. Pollock seventh edition book chapter 3. consider the question; is/was justice served? explain why you think justice was or was not served in the case in question. now, consider what you think your strongest opponent would say, and how they would back up their claims, in order to disagree with you. finally , how would you defend your position with respect to their opposition? please give me your opinions and give me your reasons why you hold the opinion you do.
note; about the paper, please do not write more than a few sentences worth of an introduction, and likewise , be as brief as possible with the conclusion. get right to the heart of the matter, giving your reasons why you hold the position you do.

CLICK HERE to get this paper